Pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation is associated with non-calcified plaque burden in patients with chronic coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation (PCAT) is a marker of inflammation of the pericoronary fat tissue, which can be assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Its prognostic value was reported in previous studies. Nevertheless, the relationship between PCAT, plaque burden and coronary artery disease (CAD) severity, are not well defined. AIM: We sought to evaluate the relationship between PCAT, CAD severity based on the CAD-RADS 2.0 score and plaque burden in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). METHODS: Consecutive patients with a clinical indication for CCTA due to suspected or known CCS were included in our study. PCAT was measured in the proximal 4 â€‹cm of each of the right coronary artery (RCA), left anterior descending artery (LAD), and the left circumflex artery (LCX). The CAD-RADS 2.0 score was assessed in all patients and total, calcified, and non-calcified plaque burden was quantitatively measured. RESULTS: 868 patients (median age of 67.0 (IQR â€‹= â€‹58.0-75.0)yrs., 400 (46.1%) female) underwent CCTA between September 2020 and August 2022 due to CCS. Weak correlations were found between PCAT and the total plaque burden, as well as with the Agatston score, whereas no correlations were found between PCAT and CAD-RADS 2.0 score. Associations were also observed between the PCAT of the LAD, RCA and LCX with non-calcified plaque burden (Odds ratios of 1.22 (95%CI â€‹= â€‹1.15-1.29), 1.11 (95%CI â€‹= â€‹1.07-1.17) and 1.14 (95%CI â€‹= â€‹1.08-1.14), respectively, p â€‹< â€‹0.001 for all) which were independent of age, the Agatston score, and the CAD-RADS 2.0 score). In addition, higher PCAT were noticed with increasing number of plaques, exhibiting high-risk features per patient (p â€‹< â€‹0.05 by ANOVA for all). CONCLUSION: PCAT exhibits significant associations with non-calcified plaque burden and plaques with high-risk features in patients undergoing CCTA for CCS. Thus, PCAT may identify high-risk patients who could benefit from more aggressive preventive therapy, which merits further investigation in future studies.

Image quality and contrast agent exposure in cardiac computed tomography angiography prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures using different acquisition protocols.

BACKGROUND: ECG-gated cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has found widespread use for prosthesis sizing before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, still little data exists on the optimal scan-strategy in such patients. We hypothesized that prospectively triggered CCTA can enable the visualization of aortic valve structures and peripheral arteries with lower radiation and contrast agent exposure in patients considered for TAVI compared to retrospectively gated protocols. METHODS: All studies were performed using a 256 multi-detector single source CT (iCT Philips, Best, Netherlands). With the prospective protocol the whole volume from the heart to the iliofemoral arteries scanned using prospective triggering. With the retrospective protocol a first retrospectively gated scan was performed for the heart and the iliofemoral part was subsequently scanned using a second non-triggered scan. Image quality was assessed semi-quantitatively and signal-to-noise- (SNR) and contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNR) were obtained for all scans. RESULTS: Prospective CCTA was performed in 74 and in 34 patients, respectively using non-tailored and BMI adapted scans, whereas retrospective CCTA was performed in 57 patients. Prospective scans required lower contrast agent administration compared to retrospective scans (71 ± 8 mL versus 91 ± 15 mL, p < 0.01) and resulted in lower radiation exposure (26 ± 7mSv for retrospective versus 15 ± 3mSv for non-tailored prospective versus 8 ± 4mSv for BMI-adapted prospective scans, p < 0.01). Visual image quality was better for the evaluation of aortic valve structures and similar for the assessment of iliofemoral anatomy with prospective versus retrospective scans. In addition, contrast density, SNR and CNR were higher in the ascending aorta with prospective versus retrospective CCTA (434 ± 98HU versus 349 ± 112HU; 35 ± 14 versus 24 ± 9 and 31 ± 11 versus 16 ± 7, p < 0.001 for all). Subsection analysis by heart rate groups demonstrated that both image quality and CNR were significantly higher in patients with prospective versus retrospective CCTA, irrespective of the heart rate during image acquisition. CONCLUSION: Prospectively triggered CCTA allows for improved visualization of aortic valve structures and peripheral arteries in patients scheduled for TAVI with simultaneously reduced contrast agent dose and radiation exposure. Therefore, this acquisition mode seems to be the preferred for the evaluation of patients considered for TAVI.

The extent of aortic annulus calcification is a predictor of postprocedural eccentricity and paravalvular regurgitation: a pre- and postinterventional cardiac computed tomography angiography study.

PURPOSE: To investigate if the extent of aortic valve calcification is associated with postprocedural prosthesis eccentricity and paravalvular regurgitation (PAR) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) was performed before and 3 months after TAVI in 46 patients who received the self-expanding CoreValve and in 22 patients who underwent balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien XT implantation. Aortic annulus calcification was measured with CCTA prior to TAVI and prosthesis eccentricity was assessed with post-TAVI CCTA. Standard echocardiography was also performed in all patients at 3-month follow-up exam. RESULTS: Annulus eccentricity was reduced during TAVI using both implantation systems (from 0.23 ± 0.06 to 0.18 ± 0.07 using CoreValve and from 0.20 ± 0.07 to 0.05 ± 0.03 using Edwards Sapien XT; P<.001 for both). With Edwards Sapien XT, eccentricity reduction at the level of the aortic annulus was significantly higher compared with CoreValve (P<.001). Annulus eccentricity after CoreValve use was significantly related to absolute valve calcification and to valve calcification indexed to body surface area (BSA) (r = 0.48 and 0.50, respectively; P<.001 for both). Furthermore, a significant association was observed between aortic valve calcification and PAR (P<.01 by ANOVA) in patients who received CoreValve. Using ROC analysis, a cut-off value over 913 mm² aortic valve calcification predicted the occurrence of moderate or severe PAR with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 63% (area under the curve = 0.75). Furthermore, multivariable analysis showed that aortic valve calcification was a robust predictor of postprocedural eccentricity and PAR, independent of the aortic annulus size and native valve eccentricity and of CoreValve prosthesis size (adjusted r = 0.46 and 0.50, respectively; P<.01 for both). Such associations were not present with the Edwards Sapien XT system. CONCLUSION: The extent of native aortic annulus calcification is predictive for postprocedural prosthesis eccentricity and PAR, which is an important marker for long-term mortality in patients undergoing TAVI. This observation applies for the CoreValve, but not for the Edwards Sapien XT valve.